Some NY Yankees now threatnin' secession
Hait tip once agin t' th' Ol' Rebel at th' League of the South's blog, Rebellion.
Lohng Island, of all places.
Frum th' blog entry:
And for those of you who always object that this is not "real" secession, take a moment to consider the justification for in-state secession by one of its chief sponsors:
"Secession is certainly in the water," said Lanza (R-Staten Island), who plans to introduce his secession legislation in the Senate before the Albany session concludes at the end of June. "People are waking up and seeing the bill that they have to pay. More and more, they are seeing through the nonsense, that something's not right."
Sound familiar? Yes, something's not right, and things are only getting worse. Our rulers in DC are spending us into perpetual slavery, while claiming increasingly dictatorial power over us. At the same time, they continue to import cheap, exploitable labor, unconcerned about the resulting crime and demographic upheaval. Don't like it? Tough. That's something the little people will just have to deal with.
Fortunately, we have the means to deal with it now. As the Mayor of New York observed in 1861:
"When Disunion has become a fixed and certain fact, why may not New York disrupt the bands which bind her to a venal and corrupt master..." ?
Why not indeed?
Ain't th' first time we seen secesh sentiment frum th' Northeast. First was evidenced in the Hartford Convention, which, despite ol' Timothy Sandefur's recint sophomoric argument, represented a real secessionist movement thar in the first cuple-a decades of the 19th century. Thin thar was th' "secession" of Town Line, NY, which voted t' rejoin th' Union only in the 1940s.
In the yars t' come, were a-gohnna see much more of-iss secesh kinda thankin', 'n it wohn't jus' be comin' from th' South.
Long live th' patriotic "Copperheads." May they tribe increase.
S. Jones























Reader Comments